Coach Chiron

Based on the information provided across the frames, the observations highlight multiple aspects of performance for both individual players and teams as a whole. Notably, there are active gameplay frames, pre-snap frames, and fumble recovery frames.

Given the need for a singular detailed analysis per request, the focus will be on the comprehensive evaluation of Frame 25 to 50, as it provides the most detailed insights into specific player positions, stances, and readiness for the play. Thus, here is the detailed response and ranked assessment:

Additional Commentary:

• Strength & Conditioning: Consistent strength and conditioning drills for both teams are essential to improve endurance, explosive movements, and overall athleticism.
• Cohesion & Communication: Promoting team communication on the field can help execute plays more seamlessly. This is especially important for kickoff and return scenarios where split-second decisions and reactions are crucial.
• Technique and Skills Development: Both teams should continue to focus on technique drills such as blocking, tackling, and ball handling to minimize errors and maximize efficiency during gameplay.

This assessment considers not only individual performance but also provides comprehensive strategic suggestions that can benefit the teams as a whole. The improvements suggested aim to enhance both individual and team dynamics for better overall performance on the field.

The analyzed frames (150-300) cover a wide range of in-game scenarios, from fumble recoveries and quick transitions to pre-snap formations and coaching adjustments. These moments are crucial for understanding a team's agility, positioning, readiness, and mental composure during a game.

Based on the overarching comments and detailed frame-by-frame insights, here is the overall performance ranking along with specific suggestions for improvements:

Reasoning:

Insights:

• Purdue demonstrated effective defensive readiness, quick formation setup post-fumble, and strong individual performance metrics (e.g., Players 13, 5, 44).
• Nebraska showcased solid offensive setups, effective lineman positioning, and readiness in executing plays (e.g., Players 11, 77, 12).
• Both teams maintained good stances and displayed appropriate spacing and alignment, reflecting disciplined and aware squads.

Improvements:

• Communication: Emphasizing verbal and non-verbal communication to ensure synchronized team movements and understanding, especially during transitional moments and chaotic scenarios.
• Footwork and Technique: Regular drills aimed at maintaining balance, quick directional changes, and leveraging position will enhance overall player performance.
• Consistency in Execution: Practicing consistency through situational drills to improve response under different gameplay conditions.
• Play Recognition: Training to better understand and quickly react to both offensive and defensive setups from opponents.

These focused improvements will significantly boost overall team performance and individual player effectiveness in future games, potentially raising the ranking to a near-perfect score.

Based on the provided frames and detailed analysis of both team and individual performances, here are the summarized insights and recommendations:

Insights and Improvements Summary:

The review frames offer a limited evaluation opportunity but can help in understanding mental aspects, physical readiness, and strategy-based adjustments. The gameplay frames have demonstrated individual efforts in running, blocking, pursuit, and tackling.

The analysis of frames 450-600 highlights a sequence of key plays and penalties involving both Purdue and Nebraska, showcasing their strengths and areas for improvement. Both teams demonstrated commendable skills but also faced challenges that need addressing to further refine their strategies and performance.

For Purdue, the focus was on exceptional individual efforts in agility and evasion, combined with solid blocking techniques. However, there is a recurring need to enhance ball security and blocking duration. Conversely, Nebraska's defensive players displayed good tackling and pursuit but could benefit from improved reaction times and better anticipation of plays.

Given the cumulative analysis from frames 450-600, here is the most capable player, along with detailed insights and improvement suggestions:

Reasoning:

• Rank (9): Player 0 earns a high rank due to their standout performance characterized by agility and the ability to sustain plays under pressure. This level of performance is indicative of a high-potential player who can significantly impact the team's success.
• Insights: The analysis reveals that Player 0's agility and awareness are exceptional, which are critical traits for someone in their role. Such skills are vital for navigating defenses and turning short gains into significant yardage.
• Improvements: Despite their strong performance, there is room for improvement in terms of ball security, crucial in high-contact situations to avoid turnovers. Additionally, enhancing explosiveness and directional change ability can further elevate their evasion skills, making them more formidable against defenses.

Overall, while both Purdue and Nebraska showed strengths and weaknesses in different areas, Player 0's performance in frames 475-500 stood out as noteworthy, with significant potential for further development. This focused improvement can enhance their individual performance and contribute to the overall efficiency of Purdue's offensive strategy.

Based on the provided analysis from frames 600 to 750, it is evident that both teams, Purdue and Nebraska, have demonstrated notable player positions and readiness during the pre-snap stage as well as during dynamic in-play actions. Each frame sequence highlights a different aspect of their performance, emphasizing the need for team coordination and individual skill development.

Overall Analysis:

Purdue (White Jerseys):

• Strong pre-snap readiness is observed with balanced and focused stances.
• Offensive players, especially those in the backfield and on the line, show preparedness to execute both running and passing plays.
• Key areas of improvement focus on explosive movements and quick decision-making during live plays.

Nebraska (Red Jerseys):

• Nebraska's defense is well-organized pre-snap, demonstrating readiness to counter Purdue's offensive maneuvers.
• Defensive players show good positioning and awareness, ready to engage and disrupt the offensive play.
• Enhancements are needed in agility, reaction time, and maintaining disciplined coverage during dynamic gameplay.

Below is a detailed response based on the collective insights and improvement suggestions for the analyzed frames:

Reasoning:

Providing a consolidated rank of 8 reflects the commendable individual and team performances observed, while also acknowledging areas that require improvement. The insights capture the essence of each team's strengths and projected areas for skill enhancement. The suggested improvements highlight specific actions both teams can take to elevate their gameplay in future sequences. By concentrating on these detailed areas, Purdue and Nebraska can bolster their competitive edge during live gameplay scenarios.

Based on the overarching comments provided for each sequence of frames, here’s a detailed synthesis of the insights and improvements for Purdue and Nebraska's special teams and defensive units:

1. Purdue Special Teams and Defensive Strategy:

   • Rank: 8
   • Insights:
     • Purdue’s special teams executed well in terms of snapping and punting. The execution was smooth, precise, and effective, which is a positive sign for the team's special teams unit.
     • The coverage team was quick and positioned effectively to limit the return, indicating disciplined and coordinated effort down the field.
     • Defensive pursuit and gang tackling were highlighted, showing Purdue’s emphasis on teamwork and aggressive pursuit.
   • Improvements:
     • Greater focus on ball security is essential, particularly in high-pressure situations like scrums for loose balls. Purdue needs to conduct drills that simulate these scenarios to reinforce secure holding.
     • Blocking techniques could be improved to ensure that blockers sustain their efforts longer and more effectively create lanes for the ball carrier.
     • Enhancing overall discipline to avoid penalties, especially in post-play situations, will be crucial for maintaining game control and momentum.

2. Nebraska Special Teams and Defensive Strategy:

   • Rank: 9
   • Insights:
     • Nebraska demonstrated strong punt block and return setup, showing readiness and strategic positioning. This reflects good preparation and situational awareness.
     • The team's aggressiveness in recovering a fumbled punt and their quick reaction to capitalize on turnovers are commendable, indicating high awareness and reflexes.
     • Defensive side showed excellent pursuit and tackling, making sure the ball carrier was brought down efficiently with minimal yards gained.
   • Improvements:
     • Nebraska’s return blockers could improve on sustaining their blocks longer to provide the returner with clear lanes, focusing more on coordinated blocking to enhance the return potential.
     • Emphasizing situational awareness drills will help the team in maximizing opportunities and maintaining control over high-contact situations.
     • It will be beneficial to enhance discipline to prevent penalties during aggressive ball recovery and post-play scenarios, maintaining a composed and professional stance on the field.

Nebraska’s overall performance in special teams and defense indicated a high level of readiness, awareness, and execution. However, they could work on enhancing their blocking strategies and maintaining discipline to avoid penalties and capitalize further on game opportunities.

Given the provided frame analyses, the insights for the player performances, and the general feedback, here is the ranking and detailed suggestions format for the highest-performing player within the specific frame range (Frame 1025 to 1050):

Insights and Recommendations:

• Player Analysis:

  • Player 85 from Nebraska demonstrated a high level of skill with his catch and run, gaining significant yardage with agility and awareness.
  • Player 21 from Purdue managed to stay close to the receiver, showing commendable coverage and pursuit skills.
  • Player 10 from Purdue, while trailing slightly in coverage, exhibited good physicality and effort in completing tackles.

• Team Analysis:

  • Nebraska's offensive execution was notably effective with strong receiver technique.
  • Purdue's defense displayed good effort but needs improvement in tighter coverage and quicker reaction times.

Detailed Explanations:

1. Rank:

   • Player 85 is ranked the highest performed (8 out of 10) indicating a very strong performance, but not perfect, providing room for improvement.

2. Insights:

   • Despite the absence of other players' performance records, Player 85’s ability to execute a play effectively under pressure stood out.
   • The focus on agility, hands, concentration, and evasion is vital in his evaluation.

3. Improvements:

   • Suggested enhancements include working on yards after the catch (YAC), change-of-direction speed, physical strength for breaking tackles, and better initial burst speed post-catch.
   • These improvements are targeted to leverage his existing skills and push his performance from very good to excellent.

This ranking and analysis should provide a clear direction for Player 85 to focus on specific areas to become even more effective in future plays while also offering a snapshot of team and individual dynamics observed in this frame set.

Thank you for providing detailed frames and the context around the Purdue versus Nebraska game. Based on the insights gathered from the pre-snap positions, defensive and offensive setups, as well as special teams' performance, here is the overall analysis, ranked, with specific insights and suggested improvements:

By addressing these improvements through targeted drills and focusing on situational awareness, both Purdue and Nebraska can refine their strategies and execution on the field, leading to potentially more successful outcomes in future games.

Based on the provided detailed analysis of each player and the overarching comments on both teams’ performance, here is the overall evaluation and ranking for the specified frame sequences:

Nebraska (Red Jerseys) generally showed commendable defensive teamwork and hustle. However, there were recurring issues with tackling form, block shedding, and initial positioning that could be improved. Their ability to read, react, and tackle cohesive attacks needs attention to improve effectiveness further.

Purdue (White Jerseys) demonstrated good offensive execution, especially with the running backs displaying vision and agility and linemen providing important blocks. However, there were issues related to ball security, maintaining blocks, and evading tackles consistently.

Considering all elements:

From the provided analyses of various frames, we can conclude that both Purdue and Nebraska exhibited commendable execution in their respective offensive and defensive plays. The insights garnered highlight several strengths and areas for potential improvement. Using the structured feedback, players and teams can enhance their overall game performance. For this detailed response, let's delve into one specific analysis, focusing on an individual player with a comprehensive assessment.

Player 12 (Purdue), Frame 1350 to 1375:

Player 12, the quarterback for Purdue, received a high rank due to his solid pre-snap positioning, suggesting a readiness to execute or adjust plays based on defensive readings. However, there are still areas for improvement essential for his future development.

Detailed Insights:

1. Strengths:

   • Balanced Stance: Player 12 exhibits a strong and balanced pre-snap stance, essential for effective play execution. His readiness to read the defense is evident, providing a solid foundation for adjusting plays when necessary.
   • Pre-snap Awareness: The focus on reading defensive setups underscores a critical skill for quarterbacks, showing that Player 12 is mentally prepared for various scenarios.

2. Areas for Improvement:

   • Scanning and Reading: Enhancing the ability to quickly identify defensive formations, potential blitzes, and weaknesses is crucial. This would enable Player 12 to make prompt and strategic adjustments before the snap.
   • Decision-making: While his pre-snap readiness is commendable, translating this into real-time decision-making during plays remains an area for improvement.

Recommended Drills:

• Defensive Formation Recognition: Practice sessions designed to familiarize Player 12 with various defensive setups could improve his pre-snap reads. Using simulated plays and pressure situations will render these drills more effective.
• Reaction Efficiency: Drills aimed at enhancing Player 12's reaction time to defensive movements can elevate his ability to make quick and accurate decisions, thus optimizing play execution.

Conclusion:

Player 12 is on a promising trajectory as a quarterback, with his current skills laying a solid foundation for excellence. By focusing on the suggested areas for improvement and engaging in targeted drills, he can further refine his capabilities, making him more adept at handling dynamic game situations.

By leveraging these insights, Player 12, and consequently the Purdue team, can expect an enhancement in their offensive strategies, leading to better execution and a stronger competitive edge.

The analysis reveals nuanced performance insights and areas for improvement, largely favoring Purdue's execution, particularly on pivotal offensive plays and special teams. Nebraska demonstrated praiseworthy efforts on individual defensive and special teams fronts, though overall team cohesion in critical moments can still improve.

Detailed Response:

Why This Ranking and Insights:

Performance Highlights:

1. Purdue (White Jerseys):

   • Player 25 demonstrated well-rounded ball-carrying capabilities, showing acute field vision and decent acceleration but needing to cement his stature further through advanced burst speed and contact handling.
   • Player 52 exemplified proficient blocking, but sustaining blocks longer could escalate the offensive momentum even more efficiently.

2. Nebraska (Red Jerseys):

   • Player 19 and Player 31 displayed admirable drive and intent, underscoring fundamental defensive qualities but fell slightly short on initial positioning and reaction effectiveness. Drills in these areas could see a substantial uplift in their overall defense maneuvers.

Why Not Higher or Lower:

• The rank '8' reflects a performance that was commendable but with notable scope for evident enhancement.
• The ability to critically distinguish improvement areas while maintaining praise for executed efforts positions this ranking insightful yet calls for a specific attentive improvement spectrum.

General Observations:

This ranked insight delineates how players can constructively leverage feedback to reinforce their roles, whether it be through agility drills, improving muscle strength, or refining tactical reader intuitivity mid-play. Player cohesion between roles, as well as consistent practice drills focusing on reactive agility and strength conditioning, will be pivotal.

By consistently working on these recommended improvements, players can enhance their standalone and team performance, crucial for pivotal game scenarios and across varying situational plays on the field.

The analyzed data suggests commendable performance across several key players with specific strengths and improvement opportunities. Based on the provided frames and performance insights, here’s the ranked analysis:

By addressing these insights and suggestions, both teams can refine their strategies and player capabilities for improved performance in critical game scenarios.

In the detailed analysis of frames 1800 to 1950, player performances demonstrate various strengths and areas for improvement. Purdue's offense has shown excellent vision, agility, and blocking, although they can enhance lower body strength and quickness. Conversely, Nebraska's defense displayed commendable effort and pursuit but needs to work on tackling techniques, positioning, and engagement with offensive players.

Out of the sets provided, one standout frame analysis based on the consistency and impact on the game would be frame 1875 to 1900 where Purdue successfully converts a 3rd and 3, showcasing the critical balance of both offensive execution and defensive effort.

By selecting the most impactful frame, we provide a structured and focused improvement plan. If you have a particular frame or player focus in mind, let me know, and I can adjust the analysis accordingly.

In analyzing the play between frames 1950 and 1975, it's clear that the players demonstrated notable efforts to execute their respective roles, albeit with areas needing improvement. Here’s a breakdown:

1. Strengths:

   • Nebraska (Red Jerseys) showed robust defensive coordination, with players maintaining gap discipline and executing tackles effectively. Players 5, 9, and 41 were particularly effective in containing the running play and limiting yardage.
   • Purdue (White Jerseys), although struggling under defensive pressure, displayed resilience and effort, especially from Player 2 (running back) and Player 75 (offensive lineman) who provided initial blocking.

2. Areas for Improvement:

   • Nebraska: Players could benefit from drills focusing on speed, strength, and reaction time to enhance their ability to anticipate and respond to plays more efficiently.
   • Purdue: Offensive players, specifically the running back and the lineman, need to work on vision, decision-making, and blocking techniques to maximize gains and sustain blocks longer.

Considering these observations, Nebraska's defense was the standout, but both teams have clear pathways to enhance performance.

After analyzing all the frames provided for various plays, let’s focus on summarizing the performance and areas for improvement for a specific player who stood out in one of these sequences. Here's an in-depth analysis:

Player #31 from Purdue in frames 2175 to 2200:

Analysis:

Player #31 displayed excellent awareness and tackling technique, leading the effort to bring down the returner.

Rank:

Based on the analysis, Player #31’s performance was highly commendable, earning a high rank on this particular play.

Insights:

Player #31 showcased strong defensive skills necessary for special teams, including:

1. Awareness: The player's ability to identify and pursue the returner was crucial.
2. Tackling Technique: He executed tackles effectively, minimizing the chance for the returner to make significant gains.

Improvements:

To elevate his performance further, Player #31 should focus on the following:

1. Maintaining Form: Continue working on maintaining proper tackling form to ensure consistency.
2. Teammate Involvement: Ensure coordination with teammates to secure tackles even faster and prevent returners from breaking free.

Based on the detailed analyses of the plays from frames 2250 to 2400, the overall performance of individual players and the teams in the context of the gameplay and special teams execution can be evaluated. Here, I'll focus on one standout play and provide insights and improvements.

Detailed Player Performance Analysis:

Player #41 from Purdue (White Jerseys):

• Strengths:

  • Excellent tackling technique and awareness, contributing significantly to the gang tackle on the returner.
  • Demonstrated strength and effective coordination in bringing down the opponent, ensuring minimal yardage gain.

• Areas for Improvement:

  • Maintain and refine tackling techniques.
  • Focus on enhancing pursuit angles and speed to impact plays more promptly.

Insights:

Player #41 from Purdue has consistently shown exceptional tackling ability and awareness throughout frames 2350 to 2375. Demonstrating strong coordination during special teams coverage, this player significantly contributed to limiting the return yardage, showcasing their effective gang-tackling efforts.

Improvements:

To further enhance performance, Player #41 should continue refining tackling techniques and maintain an emphasis on pursuit angles. Additionally, incorporating speed drills would enable this player to engage the ball carrier more quickly, maximizing impact during special teams plays.

This detailed analysis provides a structured look at Player #41's performance, outlining their strengths and suggesting specific areas for improvement to further elevate their gameplay.

The analysis covers several frames in a tight sequence of the game between Purdue and Nebraska. Here, we focus on frame 2475 to 2500, which highlights some critical individual performances from both teams during an active play.

Purdue (White Jerseys):

1. Defensive Play:

   • Player #10 stands out with excellent tackling and pursuit techniques, playing a crucial role in stopping the ball carrier.
   • Player #19 displayed good positioning but was slightly outmaneuvered.

2. Strengths:

   • Quick and efficient pursuit leading to stopping the ball carrier near the sideline.
   • Good anticipation and positioning by defensive players.

3. Improvements:

   • Maintain balance and leverage during tackles to secure stops.
   • Improve initial reactions to prevent significant gains by the offense.

Nebraska (Red Jerseys):

1. Offensive Play:

   • Player #22 showed excellent capability as a ball carrier, evading initial tackles and gaining significant yardage.
   • Player #17 contributed to downfield blocking, though could enhance effectiveness.

2. Strengths:

   • Strong running capabilities and vision in finding gaps.
   • Effective blocking leading to significant yardage gain.

3. Improvements:

   • Focus on agility drills for the ball carrier to maximize yardage gains.
   • Enhance downfield blocking strength and technique.

Long-term recommendations for both teams revolve around improving quick initial reactions, maintaining balanced tackles, and enhancing communication between players to ensure a unified response during critical play moments. These improvements will help Purdue tighten their defense and help Nebraska maximize offensive gains by better leveraging their blocking techniques and agility drills.

Based on the analysis, Nebraska's ball carriers, #21, #11, and #10, showed exceptional skills in agility and determination but often needed to improve on sideline awareness and maintaining ball security. Nebraska’s blockers, notably #84, #54, and #51, excelled in creating running lanes but could benefit from focusing on sustaining blocks longer to provide more consistent paths for the ball carrier.

Purdue’s defenders, particularly #21, #37, and #95, displayed strong efforts in pursuit and tackling but needed to work on angles, initial positioning, and reaction times at the line of scrimmage. Improvements in these areas would help them limit the advancement of the ball carriers better.

This ranked assessment (rank 8) reflects that Nebraska exhibited strong offensive aggression while Purdue needs focused enhancements on defensive techniques to counter the offensive plays effectively.

In evaluating the overall performance and ranking of the analyzed frames, Player #50 from Purdue demonstrated the highest level of skill and effectiveness. Despite certain areas for improvement, his exemplary play earns the best rank. Here is a detailed response:

Player #50 showed exceptional positioning and agility, particularly in the critical moments of staying in front of the Nebraska offensive line. Maintaining such form under pressure is indicative of advanced defensive skills and a solid understanding of his positional responsibilities. Although his lower body strength requires improvement for prolonged stability against forceful offensive plays, his current abilities are noteworthy enough to set him apart from the other players evaluated.

Based on the analysis, the standout performer was Nebraska's Player #10, the quarterback, who displayed exceptional control, awareness, and delivery under pressure. This is closely followed by Nebraska's Player #85, who showed strong route-running and catching skills. Purdue's Player #87 and #44 on defense demonstrated some solid skills but need improvements in anticipation and reaction. Here is a detailed breakdown of the performance and recommendations:

Detailed Insights:

1. Frame 2850 to 2875:

   • Nebraska's Player #85: Displayed good pre-snap awareness and positioning, ready for the play.
     • Rank: 8
     • Improvements: Focus on stance for an explosive start and maintain ideal balance.
   • Nebraska's Player #15: Showed readiness and good positioning to assist in blocking or as a potential receiver.
     • Rank: 7
     • Improvements: Enhancing pre-snap stance and staying alert for defensive shifts.
   • Purdue's Player #10: Well-positioned pre-snap with good defensive stance and awareness.
     • Rank: 7
     • Improvements: Quick lateral movements and maintaining communication.
   • Purdue's Player #87: Focused and prepared but showed hesitation in stance.
     • Rank: 6
     • Improvements: Eliminate stance hesitations and improve on reading offensive hints.

2. Frame 2875 to 2900:

   • Nebraska's Player #10: Executed a smooth snap and quick drop back with a well-timed throw.
     • Rank: 9
     • Improvements: Reading the defense more quickly to make faster decisions.
   • Nebraska's Player #85: Ran a clean route and made himself an available target.
     • Rank: 8
     • Improvements: Focus on accelerating out of the break for better separation.
   • Nebraska's Player #65: Solid blocking skills with good hand placement and strength.
     • Rank: 7
     • Improvements: Improve footwork for better balance and resisting stronger defenders.
   • Purdue's Player #87: Good defensive posture and awareness with readiness to engage.
     • Rank: 7
     • Improvements: Enhance explosiveness to apply more immediate pressure.
   • Nebraska's Player #59: Showed complementary blocking support but struggled with defensive rush.
     • Rank: 6
     • Improvements: Improve strength and leverage for better block holding.

3. Frame 2900 to 2925:

   • Nebraska's Player #85: Successfully executed a deep route with a difficult catch under pressure.
     • Rank: 9
     • Improvements: Create more separation from defenders for extra yards.
   • Nebraska's Player #10: Delivered an accurate pass under pressure with good pocket awareness.
     • Rank: 8
     • Improvements: Work on pocket mobility to extend plays.
   • Purdue's Player #87: Provided decent coverage but allowed the catch and immediate tackle.
     • Rank: 6
     • Improvements: Improve on breaking on the ball faster.
   • Purdue's Player #13: Demonstrated good pursuit and tackle ability.
     • Rank: 7
     • Improvements: Better anticipation and positioning to make plays on the ball before the catch.

4. Frame 2925 to 2950:

   • Nebraska’s Player #14: Strong running breaking through initial contact and gaining yards.
     • Rank: 8
     • Improvements: Maintain ball security during runs to avoid turnovers.
   • Nebraska’s Player #51: Effective lead blocking clearing the path and securing the edge.
     • Rank: 7
     • Improvements: Sustain blocks longer for more maneuvering space.
   • Purdue’s Player #14: Failed to bring down the ball carrier allowing significant yards.
     • Rank: 6
     • Improvements: Improve tackling technique for more secure wraps.
   • Purdue’s Player #21: Pursued well and tackled near sideline.
     • Rank: 7
     • Improvements: Arrive at the ball carrier faster with better anticipation.
   • Purdue’s Player #27: Outmaneuvered by the ball carrier failing in containment.
     • Rank: 6
     • Improvements: Improve lateral quickness and positioning for effective containment.

5. Frame 2950 to 2975:

   • Nebraska’s Player #44: Effective tackle near sideline with good awareness and physicality.
     • Rank: 8
     • Improvements: Continue maintaining leverage and hand placement.
   • Nebraska’s Player #51: Supported the tackle showing good teamwork.
     • Rank: 7
     • Improvements: Improve reaction times for quicker support in tackles.
   • Purdue’s Player #21: Effective final tackle displaying speed and understanding.
     • Rank: 7
     • Improvements: Enhance anticipation skills for earlier tackles.
   • Purdue’s Player #10: Blocking attempted but less effective.
     • Rank: 6
     • Improvements: Increase strength and refine blocking techniques.
   • Purdue’s Player #11: Struggled to break through defensive pressure.
     • Rank: 6
     • Improvements: Improve agility and elusiveness for better yardage after contact.